🔗 Share this article

In today's Britain, protest has ceased to be a fundamental right. Rather, it has become a conditional permission that those in power allow or withhold as they see fit. This represents the underlying meaning of proposed measures that the ruling administration is putting forward, which would determine the timing and location protests can take place, with potential prison sentences for those who disobey these limitations.

Erosion of Civil Liberties

Earlier administrations had already weakened this fundamental freedom: the former Conservative government had granted law enforcement sweeping new authorities, which international human rights organizations had condemned as "serious and undue limitations" on civil liberties. Collectively, these incremental assaults on freedom have effectively eliminated the historically earned right to freedom of protest.

Using Tragedy to Justify Suppression

The most recent limitations are being justified by referring to last week's heinous antisemitic attack on a British Islamic center. We can all agree on widespread consensus that the safety of Jewish communities in Britain must be safeguarded. However, using this atrocity as a justification to suppress opposition is not only unrelated to that duty but perverts it.

"When you cannot set boundaries at genocide, you likely cannot draw the line at democracy," commented a prominent American author, whose words that applies equally for the present administration.

Historical Perspective of Protest

Consider Britain's long tradition of protest and activism against racism and fascism, from the 1936 Battle of Cable Street to postwar Jewish anti-fascist movements and the 1970s demonstrations against the far-right organization. Many of these early protesters were labeled as extremists in their time, even while they were fighting for the rights of minorities.

Present Situation

In today's complicated landscape, here's what's actually happening: The Israeli government – a sovereign nation – is committing what United Nations investigations have described as systematic destruction. Its military actions have led the global justice body to issue legal indictments against Benjamin Netanyahu and his former defense minister.

Western public opinion has changed significantly against Israel's violent actions. In Britain, a large percentage of the public think Israel has likely committed war crimes. Most people would endorse a total prohibition on weapons exports to the nation, and approve the arrest of Netanyahu.

Silencing Dissent

Having essentially failed the public debate, Israel's supporters are now exploiting a vile anti-Jewish attack to try to silence a mass movement against a ethical disaster. The British government appears to be involved in this attempt. Government officials have failed to implement comprehensive sanctions on Israel and have allowed arms exports to proceed.

People who are demonstrating against the destruction of Gaza have been labeled as hateful extremists. Yet there's a important factor why there hasn't been a more extensive suppression on these protesters until now: extremely few protesters have made truly offensive statements about Jewish people, giving police authorities minimal reason to intervene.

Problematic Association

Merging Jewish heritage with the actions of the government of Israel is not only manipulative but also harmful. The official definition of anti-Jewish prejudice, adopted by the British government and numerous institutions, has been rightly questioned for potentially stifling legitimate criticism of Israel. However, there should be no disagreement about one of its key examples: that "making Jewish people generally accountable for decisions of the state of Israel" constitutes antisemitism.

Increasing Limitations

This is why we've arrived at a situation where police authorities can propose that demonstrations criticizing Israel's policies should be canceled because they might "accidentally or intentionally" support antisemitism. Similarly, government officials have declared that acknowledgment of Palestinian statehood has made organizations "implicated" in supposed mistreatment faced by British Jews.

Double Standards

On the very day as the religious center assault, the Israeli military killed numerous of Palestinian civilians in Gaza – increasing the horrific toll from two years of daily atrocities that have claimed many thousands of lives. British politicians and media outlets have hardly hidden the limited value they attach to Palestinian existence. This represents one of the most brazen demonstrations of racism in our time.

Crossing Thresholds

Our government has already passed a concerning threshold by proscribing Palestine Action, a peaceful, anti-genocide direct action organization. Multiple thousands of British demonstrators have been arrested, mostly for carrying signs against genocide and supporting the banned organization. Many of those detained are pensioners; including a retired priest and the child of a Holocaust survivor.

Global Comparisons

It's easy to see where this trajectory leads. In the United States, government officials helped demonize pro-Palestinian protests: a former House Speaker suggested that some were "connected to" other nations, while the current president described such protests as antisemitic. In doing so, they helped legitimize the authoritarian crackdown on such demonstrations – and on freedom of expression in general.

Looking Ahead

If a hard-right government comes to power, it would be granted extensive authority to suppress dissent. What might a new administration do with this repressive toolkit? Our ancestors struggled, endured hardship and sacrificed their lives to establish our liberties. We may eventually rue how easily we permitted them to be eroded.