🔗 Share this article

The number of guaranteed seats for Māori representatives on NZ local authorities will be cut by more than half, after a controversial law change that forced municipal councils to put the fate of hard-earned Māori seats to a public vote.

Historical Context on Indigenous Representation

Māori wards, which can include one or more elected officials based on local population numbers, were created in 2001 to give Māori electors the option to elect a guaranteed Māori representative in local and regional authorities. Originally, local governments were only able to create a Indigenous seat by first submitting it to a community referendum in their area. Local populations often devoted considerable time building local support and pushing their councils to create Māori wards.

Policy Changes and Government Actions

To address this concern, the previous Labour government permitted municipal authorities to establish a Indigenous seat without initially mandating them to put it to a public vote.

But in 2024, the current administration overturned the policy, stating communities ought to determine whether to introduce Māori wards.

Referendum Results

The coalition’s law change required councils that had created a ward under the previous policy to conduct binding referendums concurrently with the local body elections, which ended on October 11. Of 42 councils taking part in the public vote, 17 decided to retain their seats, and twenty-five to abolish theirs – showing many regions opposed to reserved Indigenous seats.

These outcomes represented “a crucial move in reinstating community self-determination.”

Opposition parties nevertheless have condemned the government’s law change as “discriminatory” and “against Indigenous interests”. After assuming power, the current administration has implemented sweeping rollbacks to policies designed to improve Indigenous welfare and political inclusion. Officials has said it wants to end “race-based” policies, and says it is dedicated to enhancing results for Māori and every citizen.

Urban-Rural Divide

Outcomes of the referendums were split down city-country divisions – most urban centers required to vote backed Indigenous seats, while countryside areas leaned strongly towards removing them.

“It’s a real shame for the Indigenous seats that had only just come in – they’re just beginning to find their footing.”

Voter Turnout and Concerns

The recent local government elections recorded the lowest voter turnout in 36 years, with less than a third of citizens casting a vote, leading to demands for reform.

This approach had been “a farce”.

Comparative Treatment

Local governments are permitted to establish other types of electoral districts – such as countryside seats – without first requiring a community ballot. The disparate requirements placed on Māori wards indicated the administration was singling out Indigenous inclusion.

“Well, they failed. Numerous localities have given the government a middle finger response.”

This remark concerned the 17 areas that voted to keep their wards.