Dining Across the Gap: Viewpoints on Immigration and Society
Meeting the Participants
Steve, sixty-four, Canvey Island
Occupation: Former insurance professional
Voting record: Usually Conservative, except when he resided in a left-leaning London borough and supported the Social Democratic Party
Interesting fact: His focus in insurance was kidnap and ransom: People often claim that insurance is boring, but it’s far from it when you’re planning rescuing people from South Korea because the North Koreans have opened the weapon systems”
Evie, 25, London
Profession: Graduate in psychology
Voting record: In her home country, Aotearoa, she supported both progressive parties
Amuse bouche: Eva has been employed as a singer on ocean liners; her most extended voyage was six months, which is a significant duration to be on a boat
Initial impressions
She: Steve appeared focused on enjoying the meal, to be receptive
Steve: She seemed like a very intelligent, articulate, pleasant person
Eva: I had a caprese salad, mushroom pasta, and a rich sweet treat, it was delicious
The big beef
She: He was definitely on the side of immigration being curtailed. He believes that British people who already live here, not just white British, don’t have as much access to the essential services, because increasing numbers are entering. Whereas I just disagree that the figures are that bad
Steve: I’m for qualified migrants, I don’t want to live in a white, Anglo-Saxon, Protestant country with warm beer. But I believe that authorities have used immigration to occupy positions they struggle to staff without raising wages. Wages are kept low, so taxes have to be minimized, so we are unable to improve services – allocate additional funds on child support, on education, on innovation
She: I don’t have that much knowledge of the EU referendum, because I was sixteen and abroad when it happened. He clarified it to me in a different perspective. He told me about “posted workers” – people could come here and receive solely the salary of the country they came from
Steve: Macron spent two years getting the EU to abolish the scheme; it was revised in 2018. Before that, migrant laborers coming in were undermining local employees. Under Gordon Brown, it was oil workers that were brought in; later it’s been hospitality, agriculture. She grasped that, because she’d worked on a cruise ship and said she was earning significantly higher than international colleagues
Sharing plate
He: It would be ideal to have a different energy source, transition from fossil fuels. I don’t like pollution, I love the clean air, I appreciate rural areas. We found consensus on a lot of that. But I said, “What do you think of Norway?” Their oil and gas profits soared after the conflict began, they allocated those funds to develop green infrastructure
She: So we’re dependent on their petroleum. You can see that’s not a good way to go about things. He was supportive of continuing our own oil exploration for the small amount we’ll require in the future. I kind of agree with him. We’re still going to use planes. We both think we should be moving towards greener solutions, windfarms and water power
Dessert topics
Eva: We touched on Islamophobia, though we didn’t call it that. He seemed worried by extremism coming here – he did note that a many individuals in the Arab world were radical, which I felt was not fair. I think it’s prejudiced to make judgments based on faith
He: I come from the eastern part of London. I asked her if she’d been to Whitechapel, and she said it had been modernized. Naturally, I would say that: populated by professionals. But when I go down Chrisp Street market, I look like a foreigner. People stare at me because it’s become predominantly Islamic. She had a little look at me about that. I used the word “ghetto”. Eva’s got Eastern European roots – she objects to the term, to her it denotes poverty. I said, “No, it’s an area that becomes theirs.” I consented to substitute a different word – maybe community?
Eva: I believe that Muslim people are really overrepresented in the news outlets as engaging in misconduct. It appears a somewhat racist, or prejudiced against foreigners
Conclusion
Steve: I think we separated amicably. We had a hug at the station
She: We both said that we’d had a lovely time